MongoDB vs. PostgreSQL: Which Database Should You Use in 2025?

1. SQL vs NoSQL — The Rivalry That Still Defines Modern Data

The data landscape in 2025 is unrecognizable compared to a decade ago. AI pipelines, IoT devices, and global apps generate unstructured and structured data at massive scale.
And yet, two familiar names still dominate: MongoDB and PostgreSQL.

MongoDB was born from the need for speed and flexibility, while PostgreSQL was built for accuracy and structure. Both evolved far beyond their origins — MongoDB now supports ACID transactions and vector search, while PostgreSQL stores JSON, runs AI extensions, and scales horizontally with ease.

The question developers and architects ask in 2025 is no longer “Which one is better?”
It’s “Which one fits my architecture and growth model?”

2. MongoDB vs PostgreSQL: At a Glance

Feature MongoDB PostgreSQL
Type NoSQL, document-oriented Relational (SQL)
Data Model JSON-like documents (BSON) Tables with fixed schema
Query Language MongoDB Query Language (MQL) Standard SQL
Transactions ACID since v4.0 Mature ACID compliance
Schema Dynamic / schema-less Strict and relational
Scaling Horizontal sharding Vertical + logical partitioning
Vector Search (AI) Native in Atlas Via pgvector extension
Use Cases Flexible, high-velocity data Structured, analytical workloads
License SSPL (commercial) Permissive open-source

3. What Makes MongoDB Stand Out in 2025

MongoDB is a NoSQL database designed around documents rather than rows and columns. Each record is stored as a BSON object — a binary version of JSON that allows nested structures and flexible schemas.

3.1 Why Developers Choose MongoDB

  • Schema flexibility: Fields can vary across documents, enabling rapid feature development.

  • Horizontal scaling: Built-in sharding distributes data seamlessly across nodes.

  • Native JSON model: A natural fit for APIs, mobile backends, and event-driven data.

  • Cloud-first approach: MongoDB Atlas offers serverless instances, triggers, and AI integrations.

3.2 Typical MongoDB Use Cases

  • Real-time analytics dashboards.

  • E-commerce catalogs with changing attributes.

  • IoT telemetry and event streaming.

  • Generative AI applications storing embeddings or chat histories.

In 2025, MongoDB has evolved into a data platform rather than a simple database — supporting Atlas Search, Vector Search, and time-series ingestion for AI-ready workloads.

4. Why PostgreSQL Remains the Gold Standard

PostgreSQL is a relational database known for its reliability, precision, and performance in structured data scenarios. It enforces schema, relationships, and constraints, guaranteeing consistency even in complex, multi-transaction workloads.

4.1 Why Developers Trust PostgreSQL

  • Strong consistency: Ideal for financial or mission-critical systems.

  • Rich SQL feature set: Window functions, CTEs, and subqueries for advanced analytics.

  • Extensibility: Custom data types, stored procedures, and extensions like PostGIS and pgvector.

  • Open-source licensing: No lock-in, full control over deployment.

4.2 Typical PostgreSQL Use Cases

  • Financial systems and ledgers.

  • Data warehousing and analytics.

  • SaaS backends requiring relational integrity.

  • Scientific and GIS workloads.

By 2025, PostgreSQL is the foundation of countless cloud databases — from Amazon RDS to Neon and Supabase — proving its adaptability even in serverless environments.

5. Performance and Scalability: How They Compare

Category MongoDB PostgreSQL
Read/Write Speed Excellent for distributed workloads Excellent for structured queries
Scaling Model Native sharding and replicas Partitioning + logical replication
Transaction Throughput Great for concurrent writes Superior for relational joins
Analytics Workloads Stream-based, flexible SQL-optimized, consistent
AI & Vector Search Built-in Atlas Vector Search pgvector extension required

Verdict:

MongoDB dominates when the data model evolves quickly or when performance depends on horizontal scaling.
PostgreSQL shines in structured, query-intensive systems where consistency and integrity matter.

6. Data Modeling: Flexibility vs Structure

MongoDB stores data as self-contained JSON documents. Each record can have its own structure, letting teams evolve the schema without migrations.
PostgreSQL enforces relational schema design, offering tight control through tables, foreign keys, and constraints.

In 2025, PostgreSQL’s JSONB type bridges this gap, enabling semi-structured storage without abandoning SQL control.

Use MongoDB for variable, fast-changing data.
Use PostgreSQL when relationships and integrity are central to your business logic.

7. AI, Machine Learning, and Vector Search

As AI systems rely more on embeddings and similarity search, both MongoDB and PostgreSQL adapted to the new era.

Capability MongoDB Atlas PostgreSQL (pgvector)
Vector Storage Native Extension-based
LLM Integration Built-in with Atlas AI Requires setup (pgvector + Python client)
Hybrid Search (Text + Vector) Available Manual configuration
Best For Real-time AI pipelines Analytics-driven AI use cases

MongoDB Atlas now integrates directly with LLM frameworks, making it ideal for AI-first startups.
PostgreSQL remains the go-to for model metadata, embeddings analytics, and enterprise ML platforms needing governance and precision.

8. Cost, Licensing, and Control

  • MongoDB is governed by the Server Side Public License (SSPL) — open to use but restricted for reselling or managed service redistribution. The Atlas cloud service adds convenience but increases recurring cost.

  • PostgreSQL uses a permissive license, allowing unrestricted deployment across self-hosted, managed, or serverless environments.

Summary:
If you need control, transparency, and cost predictability, PostgreSQL wins.
If you value automation, cloud-native scaling, and managed AI features, MongoDB Atlas delivers faster results.

9. Best Database for Each Use Case (2025)

Scenario Choose MongoDB Choose PostgreSQL
Rapid product iteration
Complex transactions
IoT / event streaming
Analytics & BI
Global distributed apps
Financial systems
AI vector search
Data warehousing

Modern stacks often use both: MongoDB for fast ingestion and PostgreSQL for long-term analytics — connected through data pipelines or ETL tools like Airbyte and Debezium.

10. Developer Experience and Ecosystem

  • MongoDB: Excellent documentation, first-party SDKs for Node.js, Python, and Go, and the MongoDB Atlas UI for schema visualization and query monitoring.

  • PostgreSQL: Strong community support, pgAdmin and DBeaver for management, and decades of battle-tested reliability in production.

MongoDB’s ecosystem favors speed and cloud simplicity.
PostgreSQL’s ecosystem favors control, transparency, and integration depth.

11. Verdict: Which Should You Use in 2025?

  • Choose MongoDB if you’re building flexible, fast-moving apps — SaaS dashboards, generative AI tools, mobile APIs, or IoT systems.

  • Choose PostgreSQL if you prioritize complex queries, transactional safety, or long-term analytics.

  • Combine both when your architecture demands unstructured ingestion and structured reporting side-by-side.

The future isn’t SQL or NoSQL — it’s SQL + NoSQL, working together under the same data strategy.

12. FAQ

Is MongoDB better than PostgreSQL for AI workloads?
MongoDB Atlas has built-in vector and hybrid search, giving it an edge for real-time LLM and embedding-based apps.

Which performs better, MongoDB or PostgreSQL?
MongoDB scales horizontally for write-heavy workloads; PostgreSQL delivers stronger analytical query performance.

Can PostgreSQL act like a NoSQL database?
Yes — its JSONB storage and flexible schema features make it capable of handling semi-structured data.

Is MongoDB free to use?
Yes, but Atlas hosting and enterprise features are paid. PostgreSQL is entirely free and open source.

In 2025, MongoDB and PostgreSQL aren’t rivals — they’re complementary pillars of the modern data stack.
MongoDB powers speed, flexibility, and unstructured data, while PostgreSQL guarantees stability, integrity, and analytical precision.
Choosing the right one depends on your data type, growth velocity, and tolerance for complexity.

Pick wisely — and if you’re building at scale, pick both.

William Reid
A science writer through and through, William Reid’s first starting working on offline local newspapers. An obsessive fascination with all things science/health blossomed from a hobby into a career. Before hopping over to Optic Flux, William worked as a freelancer for many online tech publications including ScienceWorld, JoyStiq and Digg. William serves as our lead science and health reporter.